dickgtax wrote:
O.K. You knew this was coming.I shoot my 391 because:
(1) Obvious: it kicks less
(2) Also Obvious: it cost less
(3) If something breaks 99% of the time I can fix it myself with parts that are cheap; and I can generally fix it right in the field without holding up the squad.
O/U: I send it to the manufacture and hope I see it again in my lifetime. Or to a gunsmith and pay for his kid's college education.
(4) Longer sighting plane, whatever that means.
(5) Fewer chokes to buy; fewer chokes to change
(6) Lots of aftermarket stuff to change the weight, balance, fit, etc. Extra trigger, $150, extra stock, about the same.
(7) Have the trigger converted to release (which I did) about $100; not $700 to $1,000 like an O/U.
(8) I have a 54 inch gun case. An O/U would be too short.
(9) Don't need to pick the empties out of the barrel and throw them on the ground. They do that by themselves.
(10) And finally, I just shoot it better.
+1 Except no release, and I have a 32'' barrel so it doesn't quite fit in a 54 inch case....
Also, I have had high end O/Us and I was always anxious that it would get knocked over in the rack or hit by a target. I felt like I had to clean it every time I touch it....etc. I have 2 390s and have less than $1100 in the pair. If a broken target hits one of them....I call it a "war scar" and move on.
I'm curious about this whole Idea of being able to change 2 chokes in O/Us as being a positive thing.....I'm not trying to start a new topic or bring up an old topic, but I struggle to believe that this is much of an advantage... many of the top dogs don't have chokes in their gun to change.... Cherry, Digweed, Faulds.....
christyouthguy-
If I could shoot like those guys, I wouldn't change chokes either...however, I can't, so I do from time to time open the chokes up on close birds or rabbits.
Just sayin'...